|
|
|
| Yodafueva wrote: | | Korus Zhett wrote: | | Yodafueva wrote: | | Journey wrote: | | What he did was wrong (inviting children to sleep with him) but I believe that there was no molestation involved and, evidently, so do the courts. The man was a child, who had his actual childhood taken away by a abusive and pushy father and he subsequently acted like a child when he grew up. |
There are plenty of criminals out there who've got some type of justification for their crimes. Just because Jackson is the king of pop, doesn't mean is excuse is anymore viable than any other joe out there who molests kids. Even if (and I find this doubtful) Jackson didn't molest these kids, sleeping with them is sickening. |
Since when was sharing the bed with someone sickening?  I've shared a bed with my sister many times before, is that sickening?
I see MJ as a mixture of black, white, man, woman, adult and child, representing everything in all of us. He was an incredible singer, who was also incredibly eccentric. There seems inherent in humans a desire to hate what is unknown to us, or strange, and MJ was certainly strange. To say these sorts of things, especially after his death, are uneccessarily harsh. |
You're actually justifying this?
It is a little weird, yes, but it doesn't compare to sharing a bed with somebody who is significantly under-aged. |
Sharing a bed with someone is absolutely harmless. Whenever my family would go away on holidays and we'd book a room, there'd more than likely be two double beds, meaning my sister and I would share. Of course this has become more and more sparse as we get older - as it should - but if a situation ever arises where, for instance, we were at our cousins a few months ago and they had a guest room with one double bed, we shrugged our shoulders and put up a wall of pillows. 
My point being, even if we assume the allegations of sharing a bed are correct, Wacko Jacko may, actually have been merely sharing a bed.
_________________
Time to start again.
|
|
