Archive for Rebels A Star Wars Roleplaying Community
 


       Rebels Forum Index -> Star Wars Universe
Obi-Tyler

Darth Maul Should've Won!!!

Yes! He should've of! Go to my myspace and look at my avatar. When Obi-Wan goes to block the second strike, you'll see that he blocks the strike on the outside. If Maul had kept swinging and it hadn't been acting, he would've killed Kenobi.

www.myspace.com/jedimasterobityler
Anakin

Error: Cannot find website.
Jaden Nightsaber

I believe the site would be www.myspace.com/jedimasterobityler
Anakin

Oh. Well actually it looks correct its just the lighting it weird on the blades so it looks diffrent but if you look at his arm movements that correspondes with the lightsaber, you can tell that he hits the second strike.
CE-Sage Mustik

no, his blade was on the outside
Obi-Tyler

Exactly, so Darth Maul should've sliced Obi-Wan in half.
Anakin

And thats why after he blocked from the outside, Obi-Wan quickly knocked the blade out of the way with another strike.
CE-Sage Mustik

exactly
Obi-Tyler

What? If it was inside the blade then Obi-Wan couldn't have been fast enough to block it or move the blade to another position. Heck, the blades probably shouldn't have even touched if Darth Maul's was inside.
Zoxa Jod

We all know Maul should have one the match, but because of timeline purposes, Obi couldn't die, and Maul wasn't going to run away.
Obi-Tyler

That's what I say and I see it as the truth. No way a Padawan could beat a Sith Lord.
Shatterpoint

It seems some people can't accept that Maul was cool looking and had a great saber but wasn't all that awesome. Obi-Wan won because it was the will of the Force and he was a smarter fighter then Maul and far wiser. Also Maul was the Sith Apprentice, even though he may have had the title of Lord.
Zoxa Jod

Maul was one of the best duellers in the series, and Obi wan wasn't his superior, it was just for timeline purposes.
Obi-Tyler

I know. Shatterpoint, you obviously haven't read any books on Darth Maul. Darth Maul was much more superior than Obi-Wan. And so I guess if Darth Maul was still an apprentice, that makes Vader an apprentice, so you should put him on the same level as Luke. Darth Maul should've won. Like Zoxa said, it was timeline purpose. Darth Maul wiped out Black Sun by himself. I don't see Obi-Wan doing that. And no, I don't like Darth Maul just because of his saber. Not everybody likes him just because of that. It was because of his saber that he should've one, giving him better reach, greater attack, and greater defense.
Shatterpoint

I did not say Maul wasn't as good of a fighter as Obi-Wan when it comes to raw skill, I said Obi-Wan was the smarter fighter, which enabled him to beat Maul and Darth Vader( PT). Also, Darth Vader was much stronger in the Force than Maul and was on a higher level, especially in the OT because he became a smarter fighter ( I guess the little incident on Mustafar tought him a lesson, lol Laughing )

And using a double bladed lightsaber does not give you much of a atvantage, it is just as dangerous to you as it is to your opponent. I fail to see how a arrogant Sith who happens to be a good duelist is better than a perhaps slightly lesser duelist who was wiser and knew how to fight smart.

P.S. I just knew that you would post something like that, lol. Laughing
Dork of Mordork

Obi-Tyler wrote:
No way a Padawan could beat a Sith Lord.


*Ahem* Then why is Maul dead? Laughing

Sorry, but I am with Lisa on this one. (And no, it's not because she's a high rank, or she's my friend, cause I am sure you'd say thats why I'm on her side.) I agree with her, Maul could never have won. I don't need to say anything, because Lisa already said it.

Sorry man, if Maul was so smart, then he would have sliced Obi-Wan in half at the part where you said he could have. Laughing
Lord Lanik

Brain TIMELINE. Maul could kick Obi's ***.
CE-Sage Mustik

did anyone read Darth Mauls journal????/

it says in there (and it was palpitine that said it) that darth maul was a much better fighter, but he was overconfindent. thats all. case closed. no more.
SkywalkerAndVader

Exactly. Look at it this way people. Darth Maul WON the Duel of the Fates, he defeated both Jedi. He just didn't finish the job, he thought he won before he actually did. Same with Mace, he BEAT Palpatine, but wasn't able to finish the job.
Obi-Tyler

Thank you SAV. That sums it up for a good explanation. And to all of the other Sith that were on my side. So for all you Maul haters out there, we'll kick your ***!! lol. j/k.
CE-Sage Mustik

yeah Mad
Butler_Swan

Zoxa Jod wrote:
We all know Maul should have one the match, but because of timeline purposes, Obi couldn't die, and Maul wasn't going to run away.

Quite correct Very Happy
SkywalkerAndVader

Ok. I'm going to sum it all up.

Darth Maul fought and DEFEATED both Jedi. He out-duled them, even if he had to seperate them. He became overconfident, and ended up failing to FINISH the fight, due to a timeline fact that Obi-wan needed to live. The duel would have been A LOT different if the timeline wasn't there. Either way, Maul was killed, due to overconfidence, but he actually won the match. Case closed.
Butler_Swan

CE-Sage Mustik wrote:
did anyone read Darth Mauls journal????/

it says in there (and it was palpitine that said it) that darth maul was a much better fighter, but he was overconfindent. thats all. case closed. no more.

Actully, there is more...it also said that he had ran into tusken raiders and hordes of space pirates on his way to get the Jedi
CE-Sage Mustik

that has absolutley nothing to do with what we are talking about here
Butler_Swan

he was weakened by them...
CE-Sage Mustik

thats still off topic...but good save
Butler_Swan

well what I meant to say was that he's not at full strentgh when fighting the jedi so he could have won...
CE-Sage Mustik

ok Smile

       Rebels Forum Index -> Star Wars Universe
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum

The Star Wars Combine Banner Exchange